Navigating the Maze of Copyrights: From Understanding to Respecting Creators’ Rights

In the vast digital landscape, where information transcends borders at breakneck speed, comprehending copyright is no longer a luxury, but a necessity. Whether you’re a budding artist yearning to share your creations or a curious consumer navigating the online world, grasping the nuances of copyright infringement empowers you to make informed choices. So, let’s embark on a journey to demystify this legal concept and explore its implications:

Demystifying Copyright Infringement:

Imagine copyright as an invisible shield protecting the creative expression of authors, musicians, filmmakers, and countless others. This shield grants them exclusive rights, akin to invisible tools, to:

  • Replicate their work: Imagine the author painstakingly crafting a novel. Copyright allows them to control who can publish copies.
  • Distribute their work: Musicians pour their heart and soul into composing a song. Copyright empowers them to decide how and where their music is sold.
  • Publicly display their work: Visual artists invest time and talent into creating a painting. Copyright grants them control over where and how it’s showcased.
  • Publicly perform their work: Choreographers meticulously design dance routines. Copyright allows them to decide who can perform their work publicly.
  • Create derivative works: Imagine adapting a book into a movie. Copyright safeguards the original author’s rights even in this new form.

Infringement occurs when someone utilizes any of these “tools” without the creator’s consent. It’s akin to borrowing someone’s tools without asking, potentially hindering their ability to create.

Beyond Legality: Respecting the Creative Spark:

Copyright infringement transcends mere legal implications. It delves into the realm of respecting the efforts, talents, and livelihoods of creators. Every song, poem, painting, or software represents countless hours of dedication, often fueled by passion and perseverance. Infringing upon these rights not only deprives creators of their deserved compensation but also devalues the very essence of their creative spark.

The Tangible Consequences of Disregarding the Rules:

While navigating the digital world, it’s easy to overlook the potential repercussions of copyright infringement. However, the consequences can be far-reaching, ranging from:

  • Fines: Copyright holders can sue infringers for financial damages.
  • Take-downs: Infringing content might be removed from platforms like YouTube or social media.
  • Legal repercussions: In severe cases, copyright infringement can even lead to jail time.

Charting a Course of Respectful Creation:

Fortunately, navigating the maze of copyright doesn’t have to be daunting. Here are some guiding principles:

  • Seek Permission: Whenever possible, obtain explicit consent from the copyright holder before using their work.
  • Embrace Fair Use: This legal doctrine allows limited use of copyrighted material for specific purposes like criticism, commentary, or education. However, fair use has limitations, so tread carefully.
  • Leverage Royalty-Free Content: Numerous platforms offer content creators a treasure trove of royalty-free resources that you can freely utilize.
  • Public Domain Works: Explore works whose copyright has expired or was never held, offering broader usage freedom.
  • Credit Where Credit is Due: When using someone else’s work with permission, always cite the source and acknowledge their contribution.

Remember: Copyright safeguards the very foundation of creative expression. By understanding and respecting these rights, we foster a vibrant creative environment where everyone flourishes. Let’s commit to responsible creation, honoring the efforts of those who bring imagination to life.

Additional Resources:

Can You Keep A Trade Secret?

Several forms of intellectual property protection are available. Patents, trademarks and copyrights are among the best known. However, there’s a fourth type of known as trade secrets.

Unlike other forms of protection, trade secrets don’t get registered or published. Doing so would be against the express purpose of this protection. Do you have proprietary assets that should be protected as a trade secret? Read on to learn more.

What Is a Trade Secret?

Trade secrets may be almost anything that gives one competitor an advantage over another. It could be a recipe, a chemical formula, a computer algorithm, a business strategy or a new invention. Whatever the item is, it’s necessary to take proactive steps to protect it.

While eventual expiration of patents and copyrights is inevitable, trade secrets never expire as long as the owner continues to make efforts to maintain confidentiality. Accidental disclosure, or disclosure through theft, must be guarded against, and it’s possible to enforce trade secret rights in U.S. courts.

An Early Court Case on Trade Secrets

The concept of trade secrets is not new. In early America, legal precedents were already being made. The year was 1837, and the case was Vickery v. Welch. Defendant Welch was a chocolatier who, through years of work, had perfected a method for making chocolate. He sold his business to Vickery, along with his insider’s knowledge. However, Welch decided to pass on his knowledge to others. Vickery objected, believing that he had paid for the exclusive right to use Welch’s secret practices. The court found for Vickery, decreeing that Welch had breached the sales contract and defeated the purpose of the deal by not maintaining the secret of his methods.

Today’s laws are based on this early case and others like it. Additionally, most states have developed laws that are based on the Uniform Trade Secrets Act. These laws provide owners with a means of seeking compensation and protection of their rights when someone misappropriates their secrets.

Why Do Trade Secrets Matter?

Sometimes, the concepts, processes and items that are protected as trade secrets are one of the things that makes a product what it is. One of the most famous trade secrets is the formula for Coca-Cola. It’s been protected for decades, and the company continues to go to great lengths to ensure that their secret doesn’t get out. Another well-known example is Colonel Sanders’ secret 11 herbs and spices that go into his original fried chicken recipe at Kentucky Fried Chicken franchises. The colonel kept his recipe secret, and it’s a tradition that the company still follows today.

For many, trade secrets matter because they are the vital ingredient in a service or product that gives the owner a leg up on the competition. It’s what differentiates them in the marketplace, and it may be what keeps customers coming back. A small secret can be worth millions, or even billions, of dollars.

Protection Is Essential

If the owner does not take proactive steps to protect trade secrets, then he may lose his rights. Several small efforts can add up to adequate protection. Print “confidential” on documents, maintain details of secrets in a secure location, ensure that computer security is regularly updated and only provide access to secrets when people genuinely need to know about them. The most important way to protect such secrets is with non-disclosure agreements. Anyone who will be privy to this information should be asked to sign an agreement before receiving any confidential data.

These agreements can be enforced in the courts. If you think that you have a trade secret that needs to be protected, ask an intellectual property attorney about measures you can take. Drafting a general non-disclosure agreement may be a critical first step.

5 Times a Trademark was Stolen or Lost

Your Trademark Identity

Your trademark is the lifeblood of your business. It’s what your business comes to be known by, and it can consist of symbols, words or a word that is used to represent the company’s goods or services. Trademarks can be tricky for new business owners because there are both common law trademarks that utilize the ™ symbol, and then there are federal Trademark Law that utilize the ® symbol.

Federal trademarks have been registered legally, though, which means that although your business might have been utilizing a trademark longer with the ™ symbol, another business could come along and gain rights to your trademark if the owners apply to have it registered with the U.S. government and obtain registration. Although your business may have been the originator of the trademark, if the trademark was not officially registered, another company could obtain it for use in geographic areas outside your use, and essentially “steal” your trademark. This is why it’s extremely important to ensure that you understand trademark law and seek the assistance of a trademark attorney like those found at the Law Office of Jeff Williams in Texas.

Plenty of instances exist during which companies lost their trademarks because the owners didn’t take the opportunity to appropriately register it with the federal government.

1. Around the World in 80 Jobs

In 2012, a man named Turner Barr started a blog entitled, “Around the World in 80 Jobs.” The man’s blog shared his experiences finding gainful employment, traveling and living abroad oversees, how he funded his traveling by taking interesting travel jobs and provided other people with travel job opportunities so they could do the same thing. His site gained huge amounts of traffic. However, a huge company named Adecco USA later came along and began a similar campaign and used Barr’s title, “Around the World in 80 Jobs.” Because Adecco USA filed a trademark application for the trademark, though, they were the ones who ultimately received rights to it.

2. Gucci Vs. Guess

Gucci and Guess are two world-renowned companies that are known for their infringement battles. Gucci has accused Guess of using their trademarked colors and symbols often throughout the years in a manner that borders on copying the Gucci brand and causes brand confusion. In 2012, Guess was found guilty of copying Gucci trademarks, such as the red-green stripe mark, the repeating GG pattern, the stylized G design mark, the script Gucci design mark and the diamond motif trade dress. Although Guess may have been using some of the designs before Gucci, because Gucci had the designs registered, they won the ruling in the case.

3. RIM Vs. BBM

Jim McLeoad is the owner of a broadcasting representation group in Canada called BBM, which stands for BlackBerry Messenger Service. His company had been using the name “BBM” for nearly 6 years when in 2010, the owner spots a RIM (Research in Motion, Ltd.) billboard utilizing his trademark to advertise its messaging service. Although the BBM trademark was well associated with the company, because it was not officially registered, RIM was able to begin marketing with the other company’s trademark.

4. Tyra Banks

Tyra Banks is one of the most popular supermodels of all time, and some wig making companies created wigs utilizing Tyra’s name, photos, images and identity in 2013. Tyra chose to sue the companies stating that they were infringing upon her very famous name. Although her name itself might not be officially trademarked, since the companies did not obtain the appropriate trademarking and permission from the supermodel to utilize what’s associated with her, they could be facing millions of dollars in penalties.


As you can see, not properly registering your trademark can result in it becoming lost or stolen or end up with you being charged with trademark infringement. A trademark attorney who is skilled at trademark law like the ones at the Williams IP Law in Texas can assist you in making sure that all your trademarks are legal.

Should You Disclose or Receive Information with Examiners?

Is it possible to disclose too much with Examiners at the United States Patent and Trademark office?

The United States Patent and Trademark office is having a “Tech Week” the first week of December (Dec.1-5, 2014). This program is designed to permit scientists, engineers, and technology experts the ability to instruct patent examiners on their field of science and technology. The idea is that this instruction will aid patent examiners in being more informed about the state of technology in the various industries and further help to improve the patent process.

Is there risk to inventors from this disclosure?

Yes, but admittedly it may be minimal. Assuming each presenter has taken the necessary steps to protect their technology inventions prior to disclosure at this event, what harm is there? Any information examiners learn and receive can be used against any relevant application. This applies to the presenter in any new or future application and to other inventors navigating the process. Some will counter this small risk by saying that it serves to help strengthen the patents being issued. I do not disagree. But just keep in mind that any disclosure and education we give the examiners can have some risk with it. Additionally, it is my experience that our examiners are pretty knowledgeable in their particular fields and are exposed daily to new and novel inventions. Do they really need more understanding?

Potential harms of disclosing too much:

  • Unnecessarily narrowing your claims: You might reveal alternative embodiments or functionalities of your invention that could form separate claim limitations, potentially restricting the scope of your patent protection.
  • Enabling competitors: You could inadvertently provide valuable insights about your invention that competitors could use to design around your patent or develop their own products.
  • Raising objections by the examiner: Disclosing irrelevant or unnecessary details could distract the examiner from the core aspects of your invention and lead to unnecessary objections or rejections.

On a flip side, the USPTO is organizing opportunities to interact with the USPTO here in Texas where they provide the public information. We are currently in communication with the USPTO about workshops and informative sessions that may arise in your local area. These workshops/sessions would be used to provide general guidance and overviews of the patent procedures (as opposed to hearing your secrets).

However, there are also situations where more disclosure can be beneficial:

  • Addressing prior art: If the examiner cites prior art that seems relevant, disclosing additional details might help demonstrate how your invention is distinct and non-obvious.
  • Explaining complex concepts: Providing comprehensive explanations and examples can be helpful for the examiner to fully understand your invention, increasing the chances of obtaining a patent.
  • Responding to office actions: When addressing the examiner’s objections, additional information might be required to clarify your claims or overcome rejections.

What danger is there in this?

The USPTO can not give legal advice for your particular situation. At times they seek to build confidence in inventors who wish to go at it alone. There is a fine line with providing the public information and in providing to much specific information. Additionally, on average the strength of patents done by an attorney are stronger than those done by an inventor alone. So these workshops/sessions, if not done well may actually work to harm the strength of patents issued. Other nuances exist of course.

In the end, the USPTO is making efforts to be engaged with inventors. Most of it appears harmless but there are always risks or two sides to the situation. It is good to see them getting involved in the public but we counsel you to be cautious when disclosing information to the patent office and be realistic when it comes to filing your own applications.

Finding the right balance:

Ultimately, the key is to strike a balance between providing enough information for the examiner to understand your invention and avoid disclosing unnecessary details that could harm your patent protection. Here are some tips:

  • Focus on the claims: Always ensure your disclosure supports and clearly defines the scope of your claims, which are the legal boundaries of your patent protection.
  • Avoid irrelevant details: Don’t go off on tangents or disclose alternative embodiments that are not part of your claimed invention.
  • Seek legal advice: Consult with a patent attorney to determine the appropriate level of disclosure for your specific invention and situation.

Remember, the USPTO has a duty of disclosure obligation, meaning you are legally required to disclose all material information relevant to patentability, including prior art known to you that might make your invention seem less novel or non-obvious. Failure to do so could result in your patent being invalidated later.

In summary, while there’s no absolute rule against disclosing too much, it’s crucial to be mindful of the potential risks and find the right balance between informing the examiner and protecting your invention. Consulting with a patent attorney is highly recommended to ensure you navigate the patent prosecution process effectively.

Social Media Username Jacking

Your Social Media Identity

Social media represents a wonderful opportunity for businesses to connect with their customers and to get the word out about specials, promotions and new products. It seems like there are new social media platforms cropping up all the time, and though it probably isn’t necessary to join them all, it certainly makes sense to choose one, two or even three that align comfortably with your company’s image and the product or service that it provides.

However, what do you do when you discover that another entity or individual has already registered your preferred company name on a particular social media platform? Sometimes this is merely the result of two companies having similar names. At other times, another user has registered your company name in a scheme known as username jacking.

What Is Username Jacking?

In some ways, username jacking is a bit like domain squatting. An entity or individual scoops up likely domain names for well-known celebrities or brands then hopes to cash in when said celebrity or brand wants to take over the domain for their own use.

The Uniform Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy, Or UDRP, is the accepted mechanism for resolving disagreements over the registration of domain names. However, there is no such mechanism in place when someone sets up a fake social media account using your name or the name of your business. Sometimes, these accounts are set up with the goal of criticizing your company. On other occasions, someone is seeking to malign your good name. It also is possible that another entity, perhaps your competitor, wants to make it difficult for you to gain prominence on that social media platform.

The idea of some unknown entity using your name to make social media posts can be troubling. There’s always the chance that your customers will see that username and believe that it belongs to you. You definitely don’t want to deal with any fallout from customers believing that they are interacting with you when they are actually interacting with someone who’s only pretending to be you.

What Can You Do About Username Jacking?

It’s vital to protect your intellectual property, especially since your name and brand help to solidify your reputation in the minds of consumers. When you find that someone has jacked your username, go straight to the complaint department for that social media platform. Their terms of use probably set up guidelines for complaining about false accounts. Some platforms have more clear-cut rules than others. Accordingly, this may not provide all of the help that you need. If the rules are sufficient, then the administrators at the social media platform will likely shut down or transfer the rogue account to you.

However, if the administrators say that they cannot help you and the owner of the account ignores your demands, then you may be forced to file a lawsuit. This may seem like an extreme response, but it also is a response that gets noticed. It typically is not advisable to sue the platform itself, as the administrators will argue that they generally are not responsible for posts made by users. Your intellectual property attorney will probably recommend suing the individual or entity behind the bogus account, a process that may involve subpoenaing the social media platform for data concerning the owner.

Speak with an Intellectual Property Attorney

A lawyer who focuses their efforts in this area of law is uniquely qualified to guide you through the process of identifying and potentially suing someone who is misusing your name or brand in the cyber world. While there is not as yet a great deal of case law in this area, legal precedent is growing by the year. Contact a skillful attorney today to learn more about the options that may be available to you.

5 Trademark and Copyright False Facts

Intellectual Property Misconceptions

Unless you’re an intellectual property attorney you probably hold a number of misconceptions about patents, trademarks and copyrights. Don’t feel bad if that’s true for you. Most people don’t need to be experts on the subject. Unfortunately, these misconceptions can lead you to run afoul of the law or to believe that you have rights that don’t actually exist.

Here are five common intellectual property misconceptions that seem to come up frequently. If you need common sense, real world advice on the subject, contact a Texas patent attorney to learn more.

1. They didn’t invent that, so how can they have a trademark for it?

A trademark is essentially a source identifier. When you see “Coke” or “Coca-Cola” on a bottle or advertisement, you know exactly which company made the product. This dovetails nicely with the fact that the Coca-Cola company also created their product. However, it’s sometimes possible for someone to register a trademark for something that they didn’t technically “create.”

A notable instance of this occurred when the BBC registered a trademark for blue police boxes. The network had used a blue police box as a central component of their Dr. Who television series for decades. Even though the actual police call boxes were created by law enforcement agencies, a court ruled that people so closely associated modern images of the devices with the show that the BBC was entitled to hold the trademark.

2. You have to enforce your copyright every time you suspect infringement.

This is certainly true for trademarks, which the registration holder must defend vigorously. Copyright holders don’t necessarily have to be so aggressive. That’s why so many people are able to write fan fiction or design fan art based on popular characters without being contacted by attorneys. The copyright holder may not feel that their rights are being infringed. Still, they can choose to enact legal remedies if they choose.

3. Big corporations are trademark bullies.

Large corporations have many resources, and one of their most valuable assets is their trademarks. They’ve worked hard to build a recognizable brand and it’s unfair, not to mention illegal, when others try to sell their products under that mark. The law enables trademark registrants to defend their rights, which is why it’s always best for smaller companies to create their own distinctive trademarks. It’s a much less expensive proposition in the long run, and it allows a startup to make a name for themselves.

4. If I’m not making money from it, it must be fair use.

Anyone who wants to freely distribute a video, text or other work that draws significantly on the creative work of others may not be protected under fair use. Whether or not money is made is not always an issue. For instance, it’s unlikely you could legally post a movie online even if you first bought the film on DVD. That movie is still protected by copyright, and consumers don’t have the right to distribute it. When it doubt, consult with an intellectual property attorney.

5. It isn’t necessary to register a copyright anymore.

Actually, registering a copyright is still an exceptionally good idea. With a registered copyright you have the right to sue people who unlawfully use your work and you can collect monetary damages. While you don’t have to register you will certainly have more legal rights if you do.

Contact the law office of Jeff Williams for a Free consultation or to learn more about patents, trademarks and copyrights. As an experienced patent attorney in Dallas and Houston Texas, Jeff is well qualified to offer guidance and advice about even the most complex intellectual property matters.

5 Tips on Trademark Enforcement

Trademarks rank among your brand’s most valuable assets. As a result, it is essential that you do everything in your power to enforce your trademark rights.

Trademarks are intended to validate the source of the products or services that your company provides. Effectively, a trademark communicates to consumers the brand’s identity, helping them to select the right product from the store’s shelves. However, a trademark is even more than that. It signifies the reputation or goodwill that your brand has worked hard to build over the years.

This means that when someone abuses your trademark rights, it’s no small matter. Accordingly, it is essential that you remain vigilant when it comes to protecting your trademarks.

How Is a Trademark Enforced?

Imagine that you have discovered a competitor in your industry that is using a logo that is confusingly similar to yours. You’re worried and outraged, and you’re determined to take immediate action.

If you consult with a trademark attorney, you’ll soon discover that the accepted course of action is to send a cease and desist letter. The letter is addressed to the infringer who may be acting either knowingly or unknowingly. That is, the infringer may be aware of your trademark and purposely infringing on your rights or the infringer may be unaware of your trademark and is consequently unknowingly infringing.

Sending a cease and desist letter frequently is all that is required to convince an infringer that they need to switch marks. What’s really critical here is that the letter be sent on official attorney letterhead. Simply put, a cease and desist letter from an attorney carries a great deal more weight with the infringer than a letter from the trademark owner would. The fact that you have retained the services of a trademark attorney demonstrates your dedication to the integrity of your mark. The infringer will almost certainly take it seriously and take immediate action.

Beyond Cease and Desist Letters

Your attorney may send a cease and desist letter, but it doesn’t always get the reaction that you hope for. It may be that the recipient of the letter doesn’t believe that their mark infringes on your rights. They may hire legal counsel of their own to defend them.

This doesn’t necessarily mean that you’ll soon be engaged in a lawsuit, although that is a possibility. Typically, your attorney and the other party’s attorney will negotiate, looking for ways that the two trademarks can coexist. As they try to hammer out an agreement, which may include the infringer selecting a new trademark, the possibility of litigation remains in the background.

A lawsuit is a last resort, but it can be a useful tool in some situations. This is just one of the reasons why it is wise to work with an attorney whenever you need to enforce your trademarks.

The Danger of Ignoring Trademark Enforcement

One of the best tips for trademark enforcement is to not ignore it. No one but you is going to handle enforcement. A business that is using your mark or one that is confusingly similar definitely does not have an interest in policing your rights. As they sell inferior products, they erode your company’s reputation, causing you to lose sales and customers.

Trademark Monitoring Ensures Better Enforcement

Savvy trademark owners work closely with an intellectual property attorney who can monitor their mark or marks. Basically, this means that your attorney, or a service that he hires, actively monitors trademark applications around the world to determine whether or not anyone is using a mark that might infringe your trademark.

If you want to get serious about enforcing your trademark, then mere registration is not enough. It is essential that you ask an IP professional to monitor the trademark to catch infringers in the act and put a stop to them.

When Do You Need to Enforce Your Trademark?

A company that’s been operating for years and has a registered trademark that is routinely monitored probably knows that potential infringers are lurking everywhere. However, this doesn’t mean that it is necessary to pursue every potential infringer with all available resources. Doing so simply isn’t feasible from business or economic standpoints.

Once again, this is why it’s sensible to work closely with a trademark attorney to enforce your rights. Your attorney can help you to determine whether or not a certain infringing party is worth pursuing.

Several factors may play a part in this decision. For instance, you may decide to enforce a trademark when the infringer is offering the same or highly similar goods that you are. If their mark is confusingly similar to yours, it may be difficult for consumers to figure out if they are buying your products or inferior products from another company. Further, if the infringer is operating in the same countries that you are, the potential for confusion and lost sales multiples.

Work With a Veteran Trademark Attorney

Whether you have a trademark that you would like to register or have enforcement concerns, contact the Law Office of Jeff Williams. We help clients pursue federal trademark registration in the U.S. and in jurisdictions around the world. Among our other services are trademark monitoring and enforcing trademark rights. With a full menu of intellectual property services available, our office is prepared to help protect some of your brand’s most valuable assets.

Amazon Acknowledges Counterfeit Problem on Marketplace Platform

Amazon is one of the top retailers in the world, second only to Walmart. It generates billions of dollars in revenue each year, but only about half of that revenue comes from Amazon itself selling products.

The other half of the company’s revenue is generated by Amazon Marketplace sales. Marketplace operates like eBay in that it provides a platform on which buyers and sellers may meet and conduct transactions. Amazon isn’t involved in the process, but they do collect a fee from each sale as their due for hosting the transaction.

It’s a smart business model, but it doesn’t come without risk. In its annual 10-K filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the retail giant mentioned for the first time the risks that come with enabling the sale of potentially counterfeit products.

What Are Counterfeit Products?

Counterfeit consumer goods, which also may be referred to as knock-offs, are products that are sold under the brand name of a person or entity that did not actually authorize or manufacture the product. Counterfeiters hope to make easy money by selling merchandise that they purport to come from a reputable company. Unfortunately, what they are selling typically is of inferior quality.

This is a major financial and reputational problem for the maker of the authentic goods. Too frequently, consumers don’t realize that what they are buying isn’t the genuine article. When they receive an item that quickly falls apart or doesn’t function as advertised, they blame the maker of the brand-name item, which didn’t have anything to do with the counterfeit.

This is a headache for big-name companies, but it can be absolutely disastrous for start-ups and other small companies. Large organizations more frequently have the deep pockets that may be necessary to combat counterfeit goods. However, small businesses don’t have those resources. The reputational damage that they suffer as a result of counterfeiting may destroy them.

Counterfeits on Amazon

Amazon’s main business model is to buy products from manufacturers wholesale so that these items can be sold to customers at a discount. Accordingly, they have measures in place to ensure that they aren’t contracting to buy knock-offs. When consumers purchase an item that comes from the Amazon Retailer tier of the business, they can rest assured that they probably are getting the real thing.

That changes when consumers are dealing with Amazon Marketplace. Although Amazon says that they try to take steps to ensure the authenticity of the goods on the Marketplace, it is ultimately only the seller’s word that backs up the items they sell. When consumers receive products that clearly are inferior, both Amazon and the purported manufacturer get the blame.

Amazon’s Reporting 2018

Each year, Amazon files a Form 10-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission, reporting their year-end earnings for the prior year. In the report covering 2018, Amazon added a notation to shareholders that acknowledges that the sale of counterfeit items on the platform is a risk.

Amazon further acknowledged that they may not be able to prevent nefarious sellers from receiving money for transactions in which buyers never receive a product or when the consumer receives a product that is demonstrably different from the advertised product.

This is the first official acknowledgment from Amazon that counterfeit consumer goods are a growing problem. However, manufacturers like Williams-Sonoma, Daimler AG and Elevation Lab have long been complaining that the retailer isn’t doing enough to curb the sale of counterfeit items on its website.

In addition, Williams-Sonoma and Daimler have filed trademark infringement lawsuits against Amazon based on the appearance of their registered marks on advertisements for counterfeit products.

Another startling claim has emerged from Apple, which says that it believes that fully 90 percent of the items sold on Amazon that purportedly come from Apple are actually fakes.

Amazon Reporting 2023

In 2023, Amazon released its third annual Brand Protection Report, which highlighted how the company’s efforts to protect customers, brands, and selling partners from counterfeit products has resulted in more criminal referrals and industry partnerships than ever before.

However, the report also acknowledged that counterfeit products remain a challenge for Amazon. The report estimated that 0.01% of all products sold on Amazon were counterfeit in 2022. This may seem like a small number, but it represents millions of products.

Amazon is taking a number of steps to combat the sale of counterfeit products on its platform, including:

  • Investing in machine learning and artificial intelligence to identify and remove counterfeit products from its platform.
  • Working with brands and law enforcement to investigate and prosecute counterfeiters.
  • Providing educational resources to help customers and sellers identify counterfeit products.

Despite these efforts, counterfeit products continue to be sold on Amazon. This is partly because Amazon is a massive platform with millions of sellers and products. It is also partly because counterfeiters are becoming increasingly sophisticated in their efforts to evade Amazon’s detection systems.

Amazon is acknowledging that it has a counterfeit problem, but it doesn’t yet have an effective means for eliminating it. This means that it is up to the manufacturers of legitimate goods to protect their reputation and revenue by seeking intellectual property protection. Obtaining and enforcing official patent, trademark and copyright coverage are among the most effective tools that organizations can use to protect their interests.

Need Intellectual Property Advice?