Washington Redskins and Trademark Rights

February 4, 2016

Federal Court Decision May Shore Up Redskins' Trademark Rights


Is the name used by the NFL's Washington Redskins offensive? That question is at the heart of an on-going court battle between members of the Native American community and the team's owners. A court decision at the end of 2015 seems to favor the team's ability to keep their Redskins trademark rights, but the plaintiffs are likely to continue their fight against registration of the mark.

The Case

The first legal action against registration of the Redskins' trademarks came in 1992 when Suzan Harjo and other Native Americans attempted to cancel the registrations by petitioning the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. At the heart of their claim was the Lanham Act, one of the foundations of U.S. trademark law, which says that any trademarks that are "disparaging, scandalous, contemptuous, or disreputable" cannot be legally registered. It took seven years, but the USPTO eventually agreed with Harjo, cancelling registration of the Redskins' trademarks. Team owners appealed the decision in court, winning on the grounds that there was insufficient evidence of disparagement. Further appeals followed, but Harjo and the other plaintiffs were unable to win, with courts saying they had waited too far beyond their 18th birthdays to file suit.

Amanda Blackhorse and other plaintiffs filed their own cancellation action in 2006. This group of plaintiffs was younger, giving them an advantage over the previous efforts. Initially, the new lawsuit appeared to pay off. In July of 2015, a federal court ordered the USPTO to cancel six trademark registrations of the Redskins mark. The judge made it clear that the team can still use the mark, but that federal registration of the mark is not legal because it could be seen as disparaging or offensive.

The December ruling turned matters around in favor of the team's ownership. The Washington D.C. District Court decided that the Lanham Act's prohibition against disparaging marks might constitute viewpoint discrimination, which would violate the First Amendment rights of citizens. This decision was not actually rendered in connection with the Redskins' lawsuit. Instead, it originated in the legal efforts of an Oregon rock band that calls itself The Slants.

A Similar Case

The Slants, four Asian-American men, attempted to gain a federal trademark registration of their name, but the USPTO refused on the grounds that the name might be considered disparaging. Undaunted, and with the assistance of a trademark attorney, the young men continued to pursue their rights for trademark registration. Those efforts finally appear to be paying off, and the victory for The Slants may translate into victory for the owners of the Redskins trademark.

Obtaining federal registration of a trademark is not always a straightforward process. Frequently, it is necessary to engage in nuanced legal arguments before the USPTO consents to registration. The cases involving the Redskins and The Slants are extreme. Most trademark rights battles do not drag on for years nor do they involve federal litigation. Still, it makes a great deal of sense to rely on the services of an experienced trademark attorney when you want to seek registration for your brand name or logo.

If you need Trademark Assistance

Texas trademark attorney Jeff Williams has tremendous experience when it comes to obtaining and protecting the intellectual property rights of his clients. If you are interested in obtaining or enforcing your trademark rights, contact the Law Office of Jeff Williams to learn more. 
Fort Worth/Arlington Office
1701 E. Lamar Blvd.,
Suite 155
Arlington, TX 76006
Fax: 888-908-6679
Dallas Office
3838 Oak Lawn Ave,
Suite 1000
Dallas, TX 75219
Fax: 888-908-6679

( By Appointment Only)

Houston Office
100 Glenborough Dr., STE 428
Houston, TX 77067
Fax: 888-908-6679
Pay Your Invoice with LawPay
Law Office Of Jeff Williams PLLC BBB Business Review
Print Print | Sitemap
2019 © Law Office of Jeff Williams PLLC. All rights reserved. The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult an attorney for advice regarding your individual situation. We invite you to contact us and welcome your calls, letters and electronic mail. Contacting us does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not send any confidential information to us until such time as an attorney-client relationship has been established.